Rolex Submariner Date vs Rolex Yacht-Master 40
Ref. 1680 vs Ref. M126621-0002
Comparing the Rolex Submariner Date to the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At ~$35,000 (market value) versus $17,550, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Rolex
Submariner Date
Rolex
Yacht-Master 40
The Rolex Submariner Date is priced at ~$35,000 (market value) while the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 comes in at $17,550. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Rolex Submariner Date trades around $35,000 and the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 around $18,428, a difference of $16,572 favoring the Rolex Yacht-Master 40. Currently trending upward at just 0% below retail, this watch retains most of its value on the secondary market. The Rolex Yacht-Master 40 commands an even stronger market premium of +5.0%, holding steady. For investors, the Rolex Submariner Date edges ahead with a flip potential score of 6/10 compared to 5/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Rolex Submariner Date | Rolex Yacht-Master 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 40mm | 40mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.5mm | 12.0mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Oystersteel and 18ct Everose gold |
| Bezel | Stainless steel with aluminum insert in black | 18ct Everose gold, bidirectional rotatable, sandblasted |
| Crystal | Acrylic with Cyclops lens | Sapphire with Cyclops lens |
| Water Resistance | 200m / 660ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Rolex calibre 1570 | Rolex calibre 3235 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 48 hours | 70 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Oyster, folded links | Oyster, three-piece solid links in Oystersteel and 18ct Everose gold |
| Clasp | Oyster folding clasp | Oysterclasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 20mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Rolex Submariner Date leads in water resistance (200m / 660ft vs. 100m / 330ft), and the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 offers longer power reserve at 70 hours, and the Rolex Submariner Date uses Stainless steel while the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 opts for Oystersteel and 18ct Everose gold. With 7 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex Submariner Date costs $875 versus $461 for the Rolex Yacht-Master 40. For water resistance, the Rolex Submariner Date delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Rolex Yacht-Master 40 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Rolex Submariner Date if you value a lower entry price, stronger flip potential, serious diving capabilities. Go with the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 if you prioritize better value retention. For pure investment potential, the Rolex Submariner Date has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Rolex Submariner Date or the Rolex Yacht-Master 40?
The Rolex Yacht-Master 40 is more accessible, priced at $17,550 compared to ~$35,000 (market value).
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex Submariner Date has a higher flip potential score of 6/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Rolex Yacht-Master 40 currently trades at 5.0% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Rolex Submariner Date and Rolex Yacht-Master 40 compare in size?
The Rolex Submariner Date measures 40mm in diameter and 12.5mm thick, while the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 is 40mm by 12.0mm. Water resistance differs too: 200m / 660ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Rolex Submariner Date uses the Rolex calibre 1570 with 48 hours power reserve, while the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 runs on the Rolex calibre 3235 offering 70 hours of power reserve.