Rolex GMT-Master II vs Tudor 1926
Ref. 116710LN vs Ref. M91350-0001
The Rolex GMT-Master II and Tudor 1926 represent one of the most compelling matchups in luxury watches — a sibling rivalry between two brands under the same parent company. With the Rolex GMT-Master II priced at ~$15,000 (market value) and the Tudor 1926 at $2,175, the price gap raises a critical question: does the extra investment in the pricier option deliver proportional value? We break down the specs, market performance, and flip potential to help you decide.
Price Comparison
Rolex
GMT-Master II
Tudor
1926
The Rolex GMT-Master II is priced at ~$15,000 (market value) while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,175. On the secondary market, the gap widens: the Rolex GMT-Master II trades around $15,000 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,740, a difference of $13,260 favoring the Tudor 1926. This watch trades at 62% above retail on the secondary market and is trending upward — a strong indicator of collector demand. The Tudor 1926 shows a more modest market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. For investors, the Rolex GMT-Master II edges ahead with a flip potential score of 9/10 compared to 2/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Rolex GMT-Master II | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 40mm | 36mm |
| Case Thickness | 13.0mm | 9.5mm |
| Case Material | Oystersteel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Cerachrom (ceramic) in black | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Sapphire with Cyclops lens | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Rolex calibre 3186 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 48 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Oyster, three-piece solid links | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | Oysterclasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 19mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: the Rolex GMT-Master II offers longer power reserve at 48 hours, and the Rolex GMT-Master II uses Oystersteel while the Tudor 1926 opts for Stainless steel. With 7 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex GMT-Master II costs $375 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Rolex GMT-Master II if you value a lower entry price, stronger flip potential, better value retention. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize the Tudor heritage. For pure investment potential, the Rolex GMT-Master II has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Rolex GMT-Master II or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,175 compared to ~$15,000 (market value).
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex GMT-Master II has a higher flip potential score of 9/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Rolex GMT-Master II currently trades at 62.2% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Rolex GMT-Master II and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Rolex GMT-Master II measures 40mm in diameter and 13.0mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 36mm by 9.5mm.
What movements do these watches use?
The Rolex GMT-Master II uses the Rolex calibre 3186 with 48 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.