Rolex Cosmograph Daytona vs Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Ref. M126508-0008 vs Ref. M79360N-0001
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Tudor Black Bay Chrono represent one of the most compelling matchups in luxury watches — a sibling rivalry between two brands under the same parent company. With the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona priced at $39,800 and the Tudor Black Bay Chrono at $5,825, the price gap raises a critical question: does the extra investment in the pricier option deliver proportional value? We break down the specs, market performance, and flip potential to help you decide.
Price Comparison
Rolex
Cosmograph Daytona
Tudor
Black Bay Chrono
At retail, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is listed at $39,800 while the Tudor Black Bay Chrono comes in at $5,825. The Tudor Black Bay Chrono comes in at $33,975 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap widens: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona trades around $71,640 and the Tudor Black Bay Chrono around $5,534, a difference of $66,106 favoring the Tudor Black Bay Chrono. This watch trades at 80% above retail on the secondary market and is trending upward — a strong indicator of collector demand. The Tudor Black Bay Chrono shows a more modest market premium of -5.0%, holding steady. For investors, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona edges ahead with a flip potential score of 8/10 compared to 3/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Rolex Cosmograph Daytona | Tudor Black Bay Chrono |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 40mm | 41mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.2mm | 14.4mm |
| Case Material | 18ct yellow gold | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Cerachrom (ceramic) in black with tachymetric scale | Fixed bezel with tachymeter scale in black |
| Crystal | Sapphire | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 200m / 660ft |
| Movement | Rolex calibre 4131 | Tudor Calibre MT5813 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic chronograph |
| Power Reserve | 72 hours | 70 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Oyster, three-piece solid links in 18ct yellow gold | Stainless steel with riveted-style links |
| Clasp | Oysterlock safety clasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 22mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor Black Bay Chrono leads in water resistance (200m / 660ft vs. 100m / 330ft), and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona offers longer power reserve at 72 hours, and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses 18ct yellow gold while the Tudor Black Bay Chrono opts for Stainless steel. With 8 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona costs $1,791 versus $135 for the Tudor Black Bay Chrono. For water resistance, the Tudor Black Bay Chrono delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor Black Bay Chrono offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona if you value stronger flip potential, better value retention, timing functionality. Go with the Tudor Black Bay Chrono if you prioritize a lower entry price, timing functionality. For pure investment potential, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona or the Tudor Black Bay Chrono?
The Tudor Black Bay Chrono is more accessible, priced at $5,825 compared to $39,800.
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has a higher flip potential score of 8/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona currently trades at 80.0% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Tudor Black Bay Chrono compare in size?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona measures 40mm in diameter and 12.2mm thick, while the Tudor Black Bay Chrono is 41mm by 14.4mm. Water resistance differs too: 100m / 330ft versus 200m / 660ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses the Rolex calibre 4131 with 72 hours power reserve, while the Tudor Black Bay Chrono runs on the Tudor Calibre MT5813 offering 70 hours of power reserve.
Related Comparisons
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Anniversary Series Silver Snoopy Award
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Heritage Black Bay Chrono
Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Black Bay Chrono