Rolex Cosmograph Daytona vs Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono
Ref. M126500LN-0001 vs Ref. M25717N-0001
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono represent one of the most compelling matchups in luxury watches — a sibling rivalry between two brands under the same parent company. With the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona priced at $16,550 and the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono at $6,425, the price gap raises a critical question: does the extra investment in the pricier option deliver proportional value? We break down the specs, market performance, and flip potential to help you decide.
Price Comparison
Rolex
Cosmograph Daytona
Tudor
Pelagos FXD Chrono
At retail, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is listed at $16,550 while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono comes in at $6,425. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono comes in at $10,125 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap widens: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona trades around $30,000 and the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono around $6,104, a difference of $23,896 favoring the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono. This watch trades at 81% above retail on the secondary market and is trending upward — a strong indicator of collector demand. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono shows a more modest market premium of -5.0%, holding steady. For investors, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona edges ahead with a flip potential score of 8/10 compared to 3/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Rolex Cosmograph Daytona | Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 40mm | 42mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.2mm | 14.8mm |
| Case Material | Oystersteel | Titanium |
| Bezel | Cerachrom (ceramic) in black with tachymetric scale | Fixed bezel with bidirectional rotating inner ring in ceramic |
| Crystal | Sapphire | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 200m / 660ft |
| Movement | Rolex calibre 4131 | Tudor Calibre MT5813 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic flyback chronograph |
| Power Reserve | 72 hours | 70 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Oyster, three-piece solid links | Fabric strap with fixed spring bar attachment |
| Clasp | Oysterlock safety clasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension | Buckle with hook and loop fastener |
| Lug Width | 20mm | Integrated fixed spring bars |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono leads in water resistance (200m / 660ft vs. 100m / 330ft), and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona offers longer power reserve at 72 hours, and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses Oystersteel while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono opts for Titanium. With 8 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona costs $750 versus $145 for the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono. For water resistance, the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona if you value stronger flip potential, better value retention, timing functionality. Go with the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono if you prioritize a lower entry price, timing functionality. For pure investment potential, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona or the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono?
The Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is more accessible, priced at $6,425 compared to $16,550.
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has a higher flip potential score of 8/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona currently trades at 81.3% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono compare in size?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona measures 40mm in diameter and 12.2mm thick, while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono is 42mm by 14.8mm. Water resistance differs too: 100m / 330ft versus 200m / 660ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses the Rolex calibre 4131 with 72 hours power reserve, while the Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono runs on the Tudor Calibre MT5813 offering 70 hours of power reserve.
Related Comparisons
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Anniversary Series Silver Snoopy Award
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Heritage Black Bay Chrono
Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Pelagos FXD Chrono