Your trusted source for luxury watch market intelligence
Watch Radar
VS

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona vs Rolex GMT-Master II

Ref. M126500LN-0001 vs Ref. M126711CHNR-0002

The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Rolex GMT-Master II both carry the Rolex name but serve different purposes — the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona as a chronograph and the Rolex GMT-Master II as a gmt / travel watch. At $16,550 and $18,800 respectively, the question isn't which is better — it's which better fits your collection and investment goals.

Price Comparison

Rolex

Cosmograph Daytona

Retail$16,550
Market Avg$30,000
Market Range$27,000 $33,000
Premium+81.3%
Flip Score8/10 – Excellent

Rolex

GMT-Master II

Retail$18,800
Market Avg$28,200
Market Range$24,816 $31,584
Premium+50.0%
Flip Score8/10 – Excellent

At retail, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is listed at $16,550 while the Rolex GMT-Master II comes in at $18,800. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona saves you $2,250 (14% less), a meaningful difference for most buyers. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona trades around $30,000 and the Rolex GMT-Master II around $28,200, a difference of $1,800 favoring the Rolex GMT-Master II. This watch trades at 81% above retail on the secondary market and is trending upward — a strong indicator of collector demand. The Rolex GMT-Master II also shows a healthy market premium of +50.0%, with upward momentum. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 8/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.

Specifications

SpecificationRolex Cosmograph DaytonaRolex GMT-Master II
Case Diameter40mm40mm
Case Thickness12.2mm13.1mm
Case MaterialOystersteelOystersteel and 18ct Everose gold
BezelCerachrom (ceramic) in black with tachymetric scaleCerachrom (ceramic) in brown and black
CrystalSapphireSapphire with Cyclops lens
Water Resistance100m / 330ft100m / 330ft
MovementRolex calibre 4131Rolex calibre 3285
Movement TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Power Reserve72 hours70 hours
Bracelet/StrapOyster, three-piece solid linksJubilee, five-piece links in Oystersteel and 18ct Everose gold
ClaspOysterlock safety clasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extensionOysterclasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension
Lug Width20mm20mm

Key specification differences stand out between these two: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona offers longer power reserve at 72 hours, and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses Oystersteel while the Rolex GMT-Master II opts for Oystersteel and 18ct Everose gold. With 6 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.

Value Per Feature

Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona costs $750 versus $705 for the Rolex GMT-Master II. For water resistance, the Rolex GMT-Master II delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Rolex GMT-Master II offers more power reserve per dollar spent.

Which Should You Buy?

Choose the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona if you value a lower entry price, better value retention, timing functionality. Go with the Rolex GMT-Master II if you prioritize the Rolex heritage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more affordable, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona or the Rolex GMT-Master II?

The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is more accessible, priced at $16,550 compared to $18,800.

Which holds its value better on the secondary market?

The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona currently trades at 81.3% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.

How do the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona and Rolex GMT-Master II compare in size?

The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona measures 40mm in diameter and 12.2mm thick, while the Rolex GMT-Master II is 40mm by 13.1mm.

What movements do these watches use?

The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona uses the Rolex calibre 4131 with 72 hours power reserve, while the Rolex GMT-Master II runs on the Rolex calibre 3285 offering 70 hours of power reserve.

Stay Ahead of the Market

Get Weekly Watch Intel

Market shifts, price alerts, and insider insights — delivered to your inbox every week. Free forever.

No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.