Rolex 1908 vs Tudor 1926
Ref. M52508-0006 vs Ref. M91350-0002
The Rolex 1908 and Tudor 1926 represent one of the most compelling matchups in luxury watches — a sibling rivalry between two brands under the same parent company. With the Rolex 1908 priced at $27,100 and the Tudor 1926 at $2,175, the price gap raises a critical question: does the extra investment in the pricier option deliver proportional value? We break down the specs, market performance, and flip potential to help you decide.
Price Comparison
Rolex
1908
Tudor
1926
At retail, the Rolex 1908 is listed at $27,100 while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,175. The Tudor 1926 comes in at $24,925 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Rolex 1908 trades around $20,000 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,740, a difference of $18,260 favoring the Tudor 1926. Available at 26% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor 1926 commands an even stronger market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. For investors, the Rolex 1908 edges ahead with a flip potential score of 3/10 compared to 2/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Rolex 1908 | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 39mm | 36mm |
| Case Thickness | 10.4mm | 9.5mm |
| Case Material | 18ct yellow gold | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | 18ct yellow gold, domed and fluted | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Sapphire, domed | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 50m / 165ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Rolex calibre 7140 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 66 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Alligator leather strap | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | 18ct yellow gold folding Oysterclasp | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 19mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor 1926 leads in water resistance (100m / 330ft vs. 50m / 165ft), and the Rolex 1908 offers longer power reserve at 66 hours, and the Rolex 1908 uses 18ct yellow gold while the Tudor 1926 opts for Stainless steel. With 8 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Rolex 1908 costs $513 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Rolex 1908 if you value stronger flip potential. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize a lower entry price, better value retention. For pure investment potential, the Rolex 1908 has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Rolex 1908 or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,175 compared to $27,100.
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex 1908 has a higher flip potential score of 3/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Tudor 1926 currently trades at 20.0% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Rolex 1908 and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Rolex 1908 measures 39mm in diameter and 10.4mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 36mm by 9.5mm. Water resistance differs too: 50m / 165ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Rolex 1908 uses the Rolex calibre 7140 with 66 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.