Omega Speedmaster Super Racing vs Tudor 1926
Ref. 329.30.44.51.01.003 vs Ref. M91550-0001
Comparing the Tudor 1926 to the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $10,200 versus $2,325, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Speedmaster Super Racing
Tudor
1926
At retail, the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing is listed at $10,200 while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,325. The Tudor 1926 comes in at $7,875 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing trades around $7,800 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,860, a difference of $5,940 favoring the Tudor 1926. Available at 24% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor 1926 commands an even stronger market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 2/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Speedmaster Super Racing | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 44.25mm | 39mm |
| Case Thickness | 14.38mm | 10mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Anodized aluminium bezel ring with tachymetre scale | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Sapphire crystal front and caseback | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 9920 with Spirate system | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 60 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Stainless steel bracelet | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | Adjustable clasp | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 22mm | 20mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing offers longer power reserve at 60 hours. With 5 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing costs $176 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing if you value timing functionality. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize a lower entry price, better value retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,325 compared to $10,200.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Tudor 1926 currently trades at 20.0% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Speedmaster Super Racing and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Omega Speedmaster Super Racing measures 44.25mm in diameter and 14.38mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 39mm by 10mm.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Speedmaster Super Racing uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 9920 with Spirate system with 60 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.