Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional vs Tudor 1926
Ref. 310.30.42.50.01.002 vs Ref. M91550-0003
Comparing the Tudor 1926 to the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $8,100 versus $2,325, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
Tudor
1926
At retail, the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional is listed at $8,100 while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,325. The Tudor 1926 comes in at $5,775 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional trades around $7,200 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,860, a difference of $5,340 favoring the Tudor 1926. Available at 11% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor 1926 shows a more modest market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 2/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 42mm | 39mm |
| Case Thickness | 13.18mm | 10mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Anodized aluminium bezel ring with tachymetre scale | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Sapphire crystal front and caseback | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 50m / 167ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 3861 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Manual-winding | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 50 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Stainless steel bracelet | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | Adjustable clasp | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 20mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor 1926 leads in water resistance (100m / 330ft vs. 50m / 167ft), and the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional offers longer power reserve at 50 hours. With 6 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional costs $171 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional if you value better value retention, timing functionality. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize a lower entry price.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,325 compared to $8,100.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional currently trades at 11.1% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional measures 42mm in diameter and 13.18mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 39mm by 10mm. Water resistance differs too: 50m / 167ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 3861 with 50 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.
Related Comparisons
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Datejust 41
vs Tudor 1926
Rolex Day-Date 36
vs Tudor 1926
Rolex Day-Date 40
vs Tudor 1926