Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space vs Tudor 1926
Ref. 311.30.42.30.01.006 vs Ref. M91350-0001
Comparing the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space to the Tudor 1926 means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At ~$6,000 (market value) versus $2,175, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Speedmaster First Omega in Space
Tudor
1926
The Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space is priced at ~$6,000 (market value) while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,175. On the secondary market, the gap widens: the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space trades around $6,000 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,740, a difference of $4,260 favoring the Tudor 1926. Trading at 9% above retail and trending upward, this model holds its value well on the pre-owned market. The Tudor 1926 shows a more modest market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. For investors, the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space edges ahead with a flip potential score of 5/10 compared to 2/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 39.7mm | 36mm |
| Case Thickness | 14.3mm | 9.5mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Black anodized aluminium bezel ring with tachymetre scale | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Hesalite crystal | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 50m / 167ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega calibre 1861 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Manual-winding | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 48 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Brown leather strap | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | Steel buckle | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 19mm | 19mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor 1926 leads in water resistance (100m / 330ft vs. 50m / 167ft), and the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space offers longer power reserve at 48 hours. With 7 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space costs $151 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space if you value a lower entry price, stronger flip potential, better value retention. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize the Tudor heritage. For pure investment potential, the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,175 compared to ~$6,000 (market value).
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space has a higher flip potential score of 5/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space currently trades at 9.1% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space measures 39.7mm in diameter and 14.3mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 36mm by 9.5mm. Water resistance differs too: 50m / 167ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Speedmaster First Omega in Space uses the Omega calibre 1861 with 48 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.