Omega Speedmaster '57 vs Tudor Royal
Ref. 332.12.41.51.01.001 vs Ref. M28500-0003
Comparing the Tudor Royal to the Omega Speedmaster '57 means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $8,700 versus $2,800, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Speedmaster '57
Tudor
Royal
At retail, the Omega Speedmaster '57 is listed at $8,700 while the Tudor Royal comes in at $2,800. The Tudor Royal comes in at $5,900 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Omega Speedmaster '57 trades around $7,395 and the Tudor Royal around $2,500, a difference of $4,895 favoring the Tudor Royal. Available at 15% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor Royal commands an even stronger market premium of -10.7%, though currently trending downward. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 2/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Speedmaster '57 | Tudor Royal |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 40.5mm | 41mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.99mm | 11mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Stainless steel bezel with tachymetre scale | Stainless steel with knurled edge |
| Crystal | Sapphire crystal front and caseback | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 50m / 167ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 9906 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 60 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Brown leather strap | Stainless steel integrated bracelet |
| Clasp | Steel buckle | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 21mm | Integrated bracelet |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor Royal leads in water resistance (100m / 330ft vs. 50m / 167ft), and the Omega Speedmaster '57 offers longer power reserve at 60 hours. With 7 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Speedmaster '57 costs $183 versus $61 for the Tudor Royal. For water resistance, the Tudor Royal delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor Royal offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Speedmaster '57 if you value timing functionality. Go with the Tudor Royal if you prioritize a lower entry price, better value retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Speedmaster '57 or the Tudor Royal?
The Tudor Royal is more accessible, priced at $2,800 compared to $8,700.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Tudor Royal currently trades at 10.7% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Speedmaster '57 and Tudor Royal compare in size?
The Omega Speedmaster '57 measures 40.5mm in diameter and 12.99mm thick, while the Tudor Royal is 41mm by 11mm. Water resistance differs too: 50m / 167ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Speedmaster '57 uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 9906 with 60 hours power reserve, while the Tudor Royal runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.