Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar vs Tudor Ranger
Ref. 130.33.41.22.02.001 vs Ref. M79950-0001
Comparing the Tudor Ranger to the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $9,600 versus $3,475, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
Tudor
Ranger
At retail, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar is listed at $9,600 while the Tudor Ranger comes in at $3,475. The Tudor Ranger comes in at $6,125 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar trades around $7,680 and the Tudor Ranger around $3,128, a difference of $4,552 favoring the Tudor Ranger. Available at 20% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor Ranger commands an even stronger market premium of -10.0%, holding steady. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 2/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar | Tudor Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 41mm | 39mm |
| Case Thickness | 14.35mm | 12mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Stainless steel fluted bezel | Stainless steel, polished |
| Crystal | Domed sapphire crystal with anti-reflective treatment | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8922 | Tudor Calibre MT5402 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 55 hours | 70 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Stainless steel bracelet | Stainless steel with riveted-style links |
| Clasp | Folding clasp | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 20mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: the Tudor Ranger offers longer power reserve at 70 hours. With 6 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar costs $187 versus $80 for the Tudor Ranger. For water resistance, the Tudor Ranger delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor Ranger offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar if you value the Omega heritage. Go with the Tudor Ranger if you prioritize a lower entry price, better value retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar or the Tudor Ranger?
The Tudor Ranger is more accessible, priced at $3,475 compared to $9,600.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Tudor Ranger currently trades at 10.0% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar and Tudor Ranger compare in size?
The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar measures 41mm in diameter and 14.35mm thick, while the Tudor Ranger is 39mm by 12mm.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8922 with 55 hours power reserve, while the Tudor Ranger runs on the Tudor Calibre MT5402 offering 70 hours of power reserve.
Related Comparisons
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Datejust 41
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Day-Date 36
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Day-Date 40
Rolex Explorer II
vs Tudor Ranger
Rolex Explorer
vs Tudor Ranger
Rolex Explorer
vs Tudor Ranger