Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
Ref. 130.33.41.22.02.001
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Ref. M126505-0001
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Ref. 130.33.41.22.02.001 vs Ref. M126505-0001
Comparing the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar to the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $9,600 versus $39,800, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
Rolex
Cosmograph Daytona
At retail, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar is listed at $9,600 while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona comes in at $39,800. The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar comes in at $30,200 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap widens: the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar trades around $7,680 and the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona around $42,000, a difference of $34,320 favoring the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar. Available at 20% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona commands an even stronger market premium of +5.5%, holding steady. For investors, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona edges ahead with a flip potential score of 5/10 compared to 2/10.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar | Rolex Cosmograph Daytona |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 41mm | 40mm |
| Case Thickness | 14.35mm | 12.2mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel | 18ct Everose gold |
| Bezel | Stainless steel fluted bezel | Cerachrom (ceramic) in black with tachymetric scale |
| Crystal | Domed sapphire crystal with anti-reflective treatment | Sapphire |
| Water Resistance | 100m / 330ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8922 | Rolex calibre 4131 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 55 hours | 72 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Stainless steel bracelet | Oyster, three-piece solid links in 18ct Everose gold |
| Clasp | Folding clasp | Oysterlock safety clasp with Easylink 5mm comfort extension |
| Lug Width | 20mm | 20mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona offers longer power reserve at 72 hours, and the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar uses Stainless steel while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona opts for 18ct Everose gold. With 7 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar costs $187 versus $1,050 for the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona. For water resistance, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar if you value a lower entry price. Go with the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona if you prioritize stronger flip potential, better value retention, timing functionality. For pure investment potential, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has the edge based on current market data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar or the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona?
The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar is more accessible, priced at $9,600 compared to $39,800.
Which watch is a better investment?
Based on current market data, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona has a higher flip potential score of 5/10, suggesting stronger investment returns. However, watch values can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona currently trades at 5.5% above retail, indicating strong value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar and Rolex Cosmograph Daytona compare in size?
The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar measures 41mm in diameter and 14.35mm thick, while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is 40mm by 12.2mm.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8922 with 55 hours power reserve, while the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona runs on the Rolex calibre 4131 offering 72 hours of power reserve.
Related Comparisons
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Datejust 41
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Day-Date 36
Omega Constellation Globemaster Annual Calendar
vs Rolex Day-Date 40
Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Anniversary Series Silver Snoopy Award
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
vs Tudor Heritage Black Bay Chrono
Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch
vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona