Omega Constellation vs Tudor 1926
Ref. 131.23.41.21.10.001 vs Ref. M91350-0001
Comparing the Tudor 1926 to the Omega Constellation means weighing a significant price difference — is the premium justified? At $11,100 versus $2,175, these two watches serve different segments of the market. Here's how they stack up on specifications, value retention, and investment potential.
Price Comparison
Omega
Constellation
Tudor
1926
At retail, the Omega Constellation is listed at $11,100 while the Tudor 1926 comes in at $2,175. The Tudor 1926 comes in at $8,925 less — more than half the price difference — making it a significantly more accessible option. On the secondary market, the gap narrows: the Omega Constellation trades around $8,880 and the Tudor 1926 around $1,740, a difference of $7,140 favoring the Tudor 1926. Available at 20% below retail and trending downward, this represents a buying opportunity for those comfortable with the current market position. The Tudor 1926 shows a more modest market premium of -20.0%, though currently trending downward. Both watches score equally on flip potential at 2/10, making neither a clear investment winner over the other.
Specifications
| Specification | Omega Constellation | Tudor 1926 |
|---|---|---|
| Case Diameter | 41mm | 36mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.17mm | 9.5mm |
| Case Material | Stainless steel and 18K yellow gold | Stainless steel |
| Bezel | Yellow gold bezel with Roman numeral engravings | Stainless steel, polished with ridge detail |
| Crystal | Domed sapphire crystal with anti-reflective treatment | Sapphire crystal |
| Water Resistance | 50m / 167ft | 100m / 330ft |
| Movement | Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8900 | Tudor Calibre T601 |
| Movement Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 55 hours | 38 hours |
| Bracelet/Strap | Stainless steel and yellow gold integrated bracelet | Stainless steel bracelet |
| Clasp | Folding clasp | Folding clasp with safety catch |
| Lug Width | Integrated bracelet | 19mm |
Key specification differences stand out between these two: The Tudor 1926 leads in water resistance (100m / 330ft vs. 50m / 167ft), and the Omega Constellation offers longer power reserve at 55 hours, and the Omega Constellation uses Stainless steel and 18K yellow gold while the Tudor 1926 opts for Stainless steel. With 8 notable spec differences in total, the choice depends on which features matter most to your use case.
Value Per Feature
Per millimeter of case diameter, the Omega Constellation costs $217 versus $48 for the Tudor 1926. For water resistance, the Tudor 1926 delivers better value per meter of depth rating. The Tudor 1926 offers more power reserve per dollar spent.
Which Should You Buy?
Choose the Omega Constellation if you value the Omega heritage. Go with the Tudor 1926 if you prioritize a lower entry price.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more affordable, the Omega Constellation or the Tudor 1926?
The Tudor 1926 is more accessible, priced at $2,175 compared to $11,100.
Which holds its value better on the secondary market?
The Tudor 1926 currently trades at 20.0% below retail, indicating moderate value retention on the pre-owned market.
How do the Omega Constellation and Tudor 1926 compare in size?
The Omega Constellation measures 41mm in diameter and 12.17mm thick, while the Tudor 1926 is 36mm by 9.5mm. Water resistance differs too: 50m / 167ft versus 100m / 330ft.
What movements do these watches use?
The Omega Constellation uses the Omega Co-Axial Master Chronometer calibre 8900 with 55 hours power reserve, while the Tudor 1926 runs on the Tudor Calibre T601 offering 38 hours of power reserve.